Any traveler, trekking through Rome would know the might and ingenuity of Rome by their impressive roads and waterways. The second point of view comes from positions of very high power and little knowledge of the use of technology. In previous times, the tools manufactured by workers for their own use were of excellent quality.
Also, the more they advertised the ideas of their technologies, the better the business was for them, making them more wealthy and important, thus more powerful. Another Roman innovation was the implementation of waterways. Han was praiseful towards its achievements and progression of the technology, while few Roman high officials depicted that the utilizing technology is favorable.
When the Roman government undertook a project, laborers were paid and therefore had incentive to do well. We are comparing similarities- social and environment, and differences- religion and interections. Pestle and mortar, iron tools, and salt to season crops were technologies the Han valued, because they were used for the most popular occupations in the empire: Eventually, these technologies were taken over by the Han government, which caused a decrease in innovation and quality.
However, they stated in different ways. Summary The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire were both very powerful nations with very different attitudes toward technology. Han was generally positive and supportive toward the technology using though Roman thought that each job has its own social dignity, therefore leading to the inferior attribute to the craftsmen and technology involver.
Doc 6 and 8 are written by Roman officials, stating that the great accomplishments -roads and aqueducts- made by the Rome, emphasizing the pragmatic and aesthetic values of the Roman technology.
Roman attitude toward technology was characterized by an affinity for large scale innovations to show off their power rather than simpler innovations, which they avoided.
Where Han technology focused on the individual, Rome technology focused on the state. Also, I urge you to follow our other suggestions. Perhaps their household lives were affected greatly by the creation of tools, an area of daily lives men of the upper class would have no knowledge of.
While both were great and powerful, Han and Roman similarities and differences in valued class, occupation, and government can be found in their attitudes toward technology. Had we gotten a document from a lower class citizen, we would then be able to draw info on how technology affected the larger part of societies.
Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues. In the group of Doc 3, 4, 6, all writers hold positive opinions toward the technology in their countries and regarded the achievements were praise-worthy. Nov 29, at 5: Obviously, Doc 5 and 7 both emphasize the difference of the crafting work and mind work, stating the social dignity of the occupation that gentlemen use their minds and commoners use hands.
Now that the state has monopolized the salt and iron trades, most of the tools provided to the workers are hard and brittle and the responsible government officials are often not available to take complaints. Did the Han look down upon technology and crafts?
Such is the case with the Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire. Nov 4, at 4: Apr 12, at Although Han insisted the praiseful perspective, there were still some imperfect aspects of the technology while Roman regarded the tool manufacturing is a vulgar profession of the career, both are the negative point toward the technology.
However, it seems that later in AD, Han governor Tu Shih invented a water-powered blowing-engine to cast iron tools. Could someone please suggest a third?
The first is shown in documents 1 and 8 where the sources are men with an occupation in technological work.In short, when comparing and contrasting Rome and Han China, the most important items are their similarities in developing technology, differences in interacting with the water around them, and the differences in social hierarchies.
The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire have different outlooks on technology, the Han Dynasty view technology as a practical application used to ease the workload of people, while the Roman Empire views certain technology as needed, despite the creator.
We will write a custom essay sample on Attitudes Towards Technology: Han China and Roman Empire specifically for you for only $ $/page. Order now DBQ on differences in Han and Roman attitudes towards technology ; Han and Roman Attitudes Toward Technology.
DBQ: Han and Roman Attitudes Toward Technology July 4, Note to teachers: This Annotated Rubric is specifically designed for the College Board’s AP World History course, but could also be helpful in any.
DBQ: Han and Roman Attitudes Toward Technology April 29, technology, along with comparing the two empires’ attitudes. (which is not required) Excellent Han China’s attitude toward manufacturing and labor was more open and positive than the Romans who had a more systematic and class-divided society, therefore causing.
Brielle Perez 10/08/11 A Block Mr. Mendive DBQ Q1 Practice Essay The glorious Han China and Roman empires both embraced technology in a time of advancing civilizations, but Han China appreciated technology to a higher degree than did the Romans, whose upper class citizens never realized its true benefits to the people as did the Han.Download